本课目标

学完本课，你能够：

• 在开场说明会议范围、可作决定和不可作决定的内容；
• 邀请较少发言者进入讨论并管理打断；
• 在不贬低细节的情况下把讨论拉回主问题；
• 检查信息来源、回应反方并判断是否已经具备决策条件；
• 主持一段6分钟多人会议并写190—240词决议记录。

本课边界

会议可以批准、修改或拒绝一个有上限的试行框架，但不能替任何员工接受具体班次，也不能对外接受预约。若框架获批，每次排班仍需本人确认；预算、工时、人数、菜单和暂停条件不可由口头热情自动扩大。一次会议决议也不等于永久延长营业时间。

场景词汇

• agenda 议程
• decision owner 决策负责人
• speaking turn 发言轮次
• off-topic detail 偏离当前决定的细节
• decision threshold 决策门槛
• action owner 行动负责人
• pause trigger 暂停触发条件
• decision record 决议记录

---

A meeting succeeds when the record is clearer than the discussion felt

Owen chairs a thirty-minute decision meeting with Rosa and Malik. The available options are: approve four smaller trials under the revised limits, redesign two larger trials or stop the proposal. No customer booking or individual shift will be accepted today.

Part A — Keeping the decision visible

Owen: We have thirty minutes and one decision: whether the revised framework is safe and useful enough to authorize planning. We are not assigning shifts or accepting bookings today.

Rosa: Let me summarize where we are. The one-year goal is an evidence-based operating decision, not automatic expansion. The revised proposal fits the eight-hundred-dollar and twenty-hour ceilings.

Malik: Before we decide, I want the staffing assumption stated accurately. I said protected coverage was possible under some rotas; I did not say every Tuesday was easy to cover.

Rosa: That’s not how your comment appeared in my first summary. I wrote “Tuesday coverage is available.” Thank you for correcting it.

Owen: Can we compare the wording before we continue?

Malik: My note says, “Tuesday is workable if no closer is scheduled to open the next morning and two people volunteer for that date.” The condition matters.

Rosa: I’ll correct the record to “potentially workable subject to date-specific coverage.” No shift will be treated as available until the people involved confirm it.

Owen: Good. Can we hear from Malik on the revised menu and group size before Rosa responds to the cost question?

Malik: Twelve guests and three preordered items protect preparation time. My remaining concern is that a late cancellation could use staff hours without producing a full trial.

Rosa: The deposit reduces that risk, and a cancellation still produces limited evidence about the booking process. I would not count it as a completed service trial.

Part B — Reaching and recording a bounded decision

Owen: We’re moving into ideas about new signs again. Could we bring this back to the main point? Do the current controls make four smaller trials more useful than two larger ones?

Malik: Four dates give us more process observations, but only if staffing is voluntary and each cancellation is labelled separately. Two larger trials would tell us more about capacity above twelve.

Rosa: The evidence most relevant to this decision is whether the core process can operate inside the fixed limits. It does not need to answer the larger-group question yet.

Owen: A possible objection is that the smaller design may make the proposal look easier than a real recurring model would be.

Rosa: That’s a fair point. I would qualify the conclusion by saying the pilot can test a bounded occasional-booking model only; it cannot justify a recurring or larger service.

Malik: With that limitation in the record, I support the four-trial option. What I need you to understand is that schedule consent must be a gate, not an action item someone can fill in later.

Owen: Agreed. Before we move on, are we ready to decide on the framework with that gate, a review after trial two and an automatic pause if cost, hours or recovery protection would be exceeded?

Rosa: Yes. I’ll own the planning sheet and evidence log. Owen remains the decision owner, and Malik will check that the written schedule condition matches what staff actually confirm.

Malik: I agree, provided my review does not make me responsible for finding cover. Each person still accepts or declines a proposed shift directly.

Owen: Then the framework is approved under those conditions. Is this an accurate record of the decision: up to four smaller trials over six weeks, no more than twelve guests, a limited preordered menu, eight hundred dollars, twenty extra hours, voluntary date-specific staffing, review after trial two and pause before any limit is crossed?

Decision record

Item	Decision	Owner／gate
scope	up to four trials over six weeks; max 12 guests; 90 minutes	Owen owns framework; no public booking yet
service	three preordered items; no hot-kitchen expansion	Rosa prepares planning sheet
resources	maximum $800 and 20 extra staff-hours	pause before either ceiling is exceeded
staffing	two named people; no closer-to-opener without adjustment	each person gives date-specific consent; Malik checks wording only
review	after trial two and after final trial	continuation requires recorded review
evidence limit	supports only a bounded occasional-booking model	no claim about larger or recurring service

Check the story

1. What is the only decision allowed in this meeting?
2. How had Rosa’s first summary strengthened Malik’s comment?
3. What condition must be met for any date to be workable?
4. Why does Owen redirect the discussion away from signs?
5. What objection does Owen raise about the smaller design?
6. What exact framework is approved?

---

拉回重点不是宣布细节不重要

Could we bring this back to the main point? Do the current controls make four smaller trials more useful than two larger ones?

好的重定向会重新说出当前决策问题，并把偏离内容放到停车区或后续行动，而不是简单说That’s irrelevant。

邀请发言要说明希望听什么

Can we hear from Malik on the revised menu and group size?

点名加主题能降低突然发言的压力，也避免把一个人当作整个群体的代表。

决议必须比口头共识更精确

We all like the idea不能执行。书面记录至少需要：scope、owner、limit、gate、review和pause trigger。

---

本课负荷说明

本课新增6个会议管理词块，不新增主要语法。L77—L79语言系统完成单元整合；CH447—CH452在多人会议中完成单元R；Unit 18—19的证据、版本和修复语言进入累计任务。

1. Could we bring this back to the main point?

礼貌重定向讨论；中性、主持性。最好随后重述主问题。

Could we bring this back to the main point? We need to choose a scope, not a sign design.

2. Can we hear from …?

邀请特定参与者贡献；合作。补充主题，不把对方当群体代表。

Can we hear from Malik on the staffing condition?

3. Before we move on, …

在转题前完成确认或关闭缺口；中性。

Before we move on, can we confirm who owns the evidence log?

4. Are we ready to decide?

检查讨论是否达到决策门槛；中性。不同意者应能说出仍缺什么。

Are we ready to decide, or is one essential figure still missing?

5. Let me summarize where we are.

在中途或结尾压缩当前共识、分歧与待办；主持性。

Let me summarize where we are before we compare the options.

6. Is that an accurate record of the decision?

核对书面版本是否忠实；正式、中性。

Is that an accurate record of the scope, owner and pause condition?

Don’t Say It That Way

容易说出的句子	问题	更准确的表达
Stop talking about that.	关闭参与而未恢复议程	Could we bring this back to the main point? We can park signage for the planning stage.
Malik, tell us what all staff think.	把个人当群体代表	Malik, can we hear your view on the schedule condition and the comments you personally reviewed?
Everyone agrees, right?	用压力代替核对	Are we ready to decide? If not, what essential condition remains unresolved?
It was decided that we’ll do evenings.	隐藏决定者并扩大范围	Owen approved up to four bounded trials under the recorded gates and ceilings.

---

L80不新增主要语法，整合未来视角、有条件提案、被动报告和证据限定。

1. 目标与截止状态

By the final review, we’ll have recorded cost, hours and recovery effects.

2. 未批准或有条件的行动

If a date were to exceed the staffing gate, it would be paused.
If two people confirm a date, Rosa will add it to the planning sheet.

前一句探索规则后果；后一句说明现实触发后的下一步。

3. 被动报告要恢复来源和强度

Tuesday coverage was described as available.
Malik’s note says it is workable if two conditions are met.

4. 会议收束框架

We agree on …
We still need …
The decision is …
The owner is …
We will revisit it when …

快速练习

选择或完成：

1. By the second review, we’ll ______ two trial records. (have completed / be completing)
2. If two people confirm the date, Rosa ______ it to the sheet. (will add / would add)
3. If the pilot were to exceed the ceiling, it ______ paused. (would be / will have)
4. Priority should be ______ to protected staffing. (given / giving)
5. 改写并恢复条件：Malik said Tuesdays are available.
6. 写一句含owner和review point的决议。

---

重定向句先缓和，再落到主问题：

Could we bring this back / to the MAIN POINT?

邀请发言时重读名字和主题：

Can we hear from MALIK / on the staffing CONDITION?

决策检查使用开放语调，允许反对：

Are we ready to DECIDE? ↗

决议核对使用稳健落调后留停顿：

Is that an accurate record / of the DECISION? ↘

影子跟读

Could we bring this back to the main point?
Can we hear from Malik on the staffing condition?
Before we move on, are we ready to decide?
Is that an accurate record of the decision?

---

A. 理解检查

判断正误：

1. The meeting can assign four evening shifts to named employees.
2. Rosa’s first summary removed conditions from Malik’s comment.
3. A cancellation automatically counts as a completed service trial.
4. The meeting compares four smaller trials with two larger trials.
5. The approved framework proves that a recurring evening service will work.
6. Any ceiling or recovery risk triggers a pause before it is exceeded.

B. 主持功能分类

为下列主持动作选择一句自然表达：

• restore the decision question;
• invite a quieter participant;
• close a missing point before changing topics;
• test readiness;
• summarize current agreement and disagreement;
• verify the written record.

C. Unit 20语言整合

不用原句提示完成18项检索：

1—6 一年目标／里程碑；7—12 提案结构／条件收益风险；13—18 资源上限／优先级／重新分配／取舍。

D. CH447—CH452单元R

你担心“自愿排班”会在会后被改写成“默认可排”。在会议中完成：

• request a full turn;
• protect the current part;
• state the core meaning;
• narrow what you need others to agree to;
• write a future rule;
• confirm the rule.

E. CH441—CH446远迁移：版本核对

会议记录写Staff confirmed Tuesday availability.原始留言写Tuesday may be workable if two people volunteer and neither opens the next day.使用六个版本求证词块，写出最小必要更正。

F. CH417—CH428远迁移：证据与反方

回应：Four small trials will prove that regular evening opening is profitable.必须指出最相关证据、限制、最强反方、仍可支持的有限结论及最可辩护结论。

G. 陌生声音：Noor的预约询问

先听两遍，不看文字稿。记录：

1. Noor代表多大的团体？
2. 她希望多少个日期？
3. 她请求哪些超出当前框架的服务？
4. 这条询问能否被当作已接受预约或全部需求的代表？
5. 向会议作60秒中性转告，区分原话、推断和未知项。

H. 六分钟多人会议

三人分别担任chair、proposal owner和affected participant。会议必须完成：

• scope and decision authority;
• one source correction;
• one invited turn;
• one respectful redirect;
• one objection and qualification;
• exact decision, owner, limit, review and pause trigger.

I. 八分钟Unit 19—20累计调解

输入包括：一条未经授权的代理回复、一份提案摘要、一份资源表和一条员工条件留言。先用Unit 19语言区分行为、意图、影响和版本，再用Unit 20语言主持会议、比较方案并形成决议。必须显式使用：

• one modal-perfect interpretation;
• one useful mixed conditional;
• one source／version check;
• one bounded listening turn;
• one future milestone;
• one conditional proposal;
• one resource trade-off;
• one verified decision record.

J. 实用写作：决议记录

写190—240词，包含purpose / sources reviewed / decision / non-decision / scope / owners / ceiling / consent gate / review point / pause trigger / evidence limitation。

K. 中译英情境表达

1. 我们能把讨论拉回重点吗？现在需要决定的是范围，不是标牌设计。
2. 我们能先听听Malik对排班条件的看法吗？
3. 在进入下一项之前，我们能确认谁负责证据记录吗？
4. 我们准备好作决定了吗，还是仍缺一个必要数字？
5. 在比较方案之前，我来总结一下目前的位置。
6. 这是否准确记录了范围、负责人和暂停条件？

---

写一张主持人卡

只保留六行：scope / voices needed / main question / parking lot / decision threshold / record check。主持时不读长稿。

做一次“不可决定项”检查

在议程顶端写出今天无权决定的两件事。若结论跨过权限、预算或个人同意边界，就缩回到合法可执行范围。

三天后的复测

用一个全新议题主持三分钟简会。必须邀请一次发言、重定向一次、保留一次反对意见，并在结尾核对书面决定。

---

• 我能在开场说明范围、权限和不可决定项。
• 我能邀请参与、管理打断并礼貌拉回重点。
• 我能在作决定前核对来源、条件和反方。
• 我能写出负责人、上限、同意门槛、复查点和暂停条件。
• 我完成了6分钟会议、190—240词决议、陌生声音调解和Unit 19—20累计任务。